NewsDredge

Truth gets buried every day by our news media. NewsDredge digs it up for YOU!

Friday, February 02, 2007

 

Bush bald...



A friend of mine has a friend who was aboard the aircraft carrier when Bush declared that the mission was, indeed, accomplished. This fellow (a Bush supporter) saw Bush come out of a workout room and noticed that Bush was bald on top. And then he had this picture snapped with our Beloved Moral Leader.

Actually, as far as toupees go, Bush has shown some uncharacteristic restraint. His makes him appear as if he has a bit of a receding hairline, but this photo proves otherwise.

That no one has ever said a word about his rug underscores the ability of this administration to keep a lid on unflattering news. Good thing he has nothing else to hide (hic, pop, guzzle)!


2/03/07 Note: After reading comments regarding this post, besides vouching for the authenticity of this photo, I want to vouch for its "newsworthiness." And it's not so much that Bush wears a rug.

Do you remember when Ronald Reagan was always accused of dying his hair? The news media always brought it up - along with much more important aspects of his presidency. Those were the days.

The MSM has given Bush a pass on every aspect of his presidency and his life. From his drug use to starting an illegal war, they've turned a blind eye. And this toupee story is just another very real, albeit somewhat humorous example. Hundreds probably know Bush wears a piece. Yet, they've kept quiet. Just like they've kept quiet about more sinister, more important matters. Thanks for reading!

Comments:
Maybe he does a backhair combover
 
They say that he is pharmaceutically switched on in the morning and chemically put to bed at night.
 
Now I gotta go look at all his pictures to find the toupee line. Great picture!
 
I hope you don't mind if I use this picture at The American Insurgency with a link back to you as original source. Thanks!
 
This administration even lies about hair? Add it to the list of lies and violations of rights. However, do not expect to see this picture anywhere because it will be as censored as the Rummy-Hussien pictures. After all, censorship is becoming America's favorite past-time. The US gov't (and their corporate friends), already detain protesters, ban books like "America Deceived" America Deceived (book) from Amazon and Wikipedia, and fire 21-year tenured, BYU physics professor Steven Jones because he proved explosives, thermite in particular, took down the WTC buildings. Let's be certian this Bush-bald-pic is not photo-shopped before every links to it.
 
Since the commander in thief is wearing a piece, can any of these sailors guarantee by sight that he still has cajones?
 
Um. Dude, it's just being backlit, which makes it appear white. Combined with the white background, this is why you can't see it.
 
Actually the light is in front of Bush and behind the sailors. An eyewitness saw Bush without his rug. That's a lot of light bouncing off his overly extended forehead!
 
It's not that he's bald. My question is what was he doing with three smiling sailors that his toupee fell off?
 
I'm so tired of this "America Deceived" douche, how come I see you plugging your "banned" book every where I go for the last 6 months. STFU and get off the internet.
 
If this is true, it's just another way Bush is a hypocrite. He's always making bald jokes at the expensive of reporters and journalists.
 
"Do you remember when Ronald Reagan was always accused of dying his hair?"

There were very silly people then, too, yes. OBTW: The WH barber (BC - Before Clinton - there was a WH barber) did Reagan's hair and swore it was natural. Take that for what you will.

"That no one has ever said a word about his rug underscores the ability of this administration to keep a lid on unflattering news."

Or perhaps he's not really bald and the picture really is Photoshopped. It's a genuine scoop if true: No one else has ever noticed Bush wears a piece and with 8 years of anal-class scrutiny you'd think someone would have brought it up before.
 
There has never been a less-scrutinized president than W. Remember how the NY Times and others got on the rah-rah express for this war? Why? Because if they scrutinized him very much we would all be saying "Oh shit. How fast can I transfer my stocks to a country where the president isn't a liar/insane/drugged?" And the US economy would sink.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
Links